Sunday, March 26, 2006
SystemsI did not mention any issues about V for Vendetta in my previous post cuz I felt that I would not be able to substantiate so many issues at one go. Anyway, towards the end of the film, most of the key players in the plot were killed off. Yes, V, the chancellor and the chancellor's right hand man were all killed off. Despite this, the plan that was already set in motion, did not stop. The march continued towards the government building. The "system" (military) to protect the building was already in place. Without the key players (Chancellor or Right hand man), the system could not execute what it was meant to do - to shoot at the protesting parties.
Well.. We are living in a world run by systems. System of education, system of purchase, public transport system, power grids, library systems, law and order - all of which are man-made systems to run our everyday lives. It is through these systems that we gain the "smooth" flows in our daily lives. Because these systems become part and parcel of our daily lives, we forget a simple and obvious point, they are created and run by people. There are loopholes in the systems because we created them. There are lapses in the systems because we are a part of them and some of us run them.
Since there are loopholes, there are probably times whereby people are "victimised" by the system as they may for some reasons overlook portions of the system. And also times when people see the loopholes and cheat the systems. At this point in time, who is to separate the victims from the cheaters? The people who run the systems.
People being people, we may use our emotions to judge the senarioes and may believe in the "victims". However, this will represent a lapse in the system and an avenue for the cheaters to cheat the system. Thus a lapse in the system, and also an injustice for those faithful to the system.
On the other hand, the people running the system may choose to "go by the book" and refrain from judging. This closes the avenue for cheats yet opens the avenue for victimisation (is there such a word?) to occur. Thus the "smooth" running and accountability for the system, at the same time, a form of injustice for who unwittingly fall into the situation of being victims of the unhumanly systems.
Based on the simple theory of action and reaction, I agree with the former. If I were a victim of the system, it is natural for me to argue that people should follow the first stand. And yes, I will definitely be angry. They should understand my plight!
However, if I were just a by-stander, abstracted from the situation, I would agree with the latter. It is easier to manage if you were to simply go by the book, not personal judgement. It is probably right that we feel this way because we are so used to systems that we lose our trust in our own judgement and emotions. I shall not dwell on it.
Ha.. This is as good as sitting on the fence, I know. And as a friend commented, "This is so Kenneth."
Yet, I do not ask that you, my readers, see things from my view or not make a stand, but only that you understand the both sides of the issue.
On this note, may I also ask for your comments if this entry is at all understandable to you? or is it confusing?
The Origin. 3/26/2006 06:48:00 pm